Gotcha. Yeah, I can see why is better for concurrency.
Thanks for your help.
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:05 AM, pamela (Google Employee) <
pamela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For example, if you are storing the information about a shape that a
> participant just drew:
> You could do:
> delta = {'pamela.fox': "{'color':'red','shape':'circle'}"}
>
> Or, you could do:
> delta = {'pamela.fox-color': 'red'}
> delta = {'pamela.fox-shape': 'circle'}
>
> It may seem less elegant, but it is better in terms of concurrency, as it
> means that I can independently change different properties.
>
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Agustin Horischnik <agu...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> > Ah, got it. What was your experiencing with using simplejson? You should
>> be
>> > able to serialize that object and pass it through the delta. We don't
>> have a
>> > demo of that, but think it should work.
>>
>> I don't remember but I'll re-try simplejson and report back.
>>
>> > You could also consider using more complex keys, like
>> > viewerName-propertyName-subPropertyName, etc. That is a bit better in
>> terms
>> > of concurrency.
>>
>> hmm... I'm not sure I get that... could you please give me an example
>> whenever you have the time?
>>
>> Agustin.
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
