Hi Teddy, can you paste a few lines from your outgoing json containing the
strings you think could be causing the problem and maybe the bit of code
you're using to submit the delta and encode it?
I ended up using Pamela's suggestion but I'll be happy to try your code and
see if I find something.
Agustin.
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Teddy Jasin <jasin.te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Agustin,
>
> I think I'm also facing same issue with you.
> in my case I'm sending data from the robot to the gadget also using
> json, however my json data is arabic texts which is converted
> unicode... so it become longer json strings.
>
> the gadget will not show if the passed data is too long.
> so I guess my json data is too big to be passed into the gadget.
> anyone can help me in this?
>
> On Oct 26, 7:17 pm, Agustin Horischnik <agu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Reporting back on serializing objects and submitting them as delta.
> >
> > I tried again using simplejson and the result is what I described
> > earlier without explicitly encoding them: the gadget breaks (i.e. in
> > this case it doesn't get
> > appended to the blip) and yet I see no errors in the log.
> >
> > Let me know if need more info.
> >
> > Agustin.
> >
> > On Oct 22, 2:14 am, Agustin Horischnik <agu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Gotcha. Yeah, I can see why is better for concurrency.
> > > Thanks for your help.
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 3:05 AM, pamela (Google Employee) <
> >
> > > pamela...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > For example, if you are storing the information about a shape that a
> > > > participant just drew:
> > > > You could do:
> > > > delta = {'pamela.fox': "{'color':'red','shape':'circle'}"}
> >
> > > > Or, you could do:
> > > > delta = {'pamela.fox-color': 'red'}
> > > > delta = {'pamela.fox-shape': 'circle'}
> >
> > > > It may seem less elegant, but it is better in terms of concurrency,
> as it
> > > > means that I can independently change different properties.
> >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Agustin Horischnik <
> agu...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > >> > Ah, got it. What was your experiencing with using simplejson? You
> should
> > > >> be
> > > >> > able to serialize that object and pass it through the delta. We
> don't
> > > >> have a
> > > >> > demo of that, but think it should work.
> >
> > > >> I don't remember but I'll re-try simplejson and report back.
> >
> > > >> > You could also consider using more complex keys, like
> > > >> > viewerName-propertyName-subPropertyName, etc. That is a bit better
> in
> > > >> terms
> > > >> > of concurrency.
> >
> > > >> hmm... I'm not sure I get that... could you please give me an
> example
> > > >> whenever you have the time?
> >
> > > >> Agustin.
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Wave API" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
