On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Scott Blum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think Bob (and Thomas's) point is that sometimes you have configuration > data for which there is an infinite number of options, where it doesn't even > make sense to think of the possible options as a set. > Oh, here's one concrete example where I'd find this useful: In JUnit, I need GWTRunnerGenerator to know the name of the currently-compiling module. The way I'm doing that today is to define a synthetic deferred property with only one value, then set that value as the active one. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
