Would it make sense to group fragment files under a subdir whose name is the strong name of the startup script? A40BE3F0/ A40BE3F0-001.cache.js A40BE3F0-002.cache.js A40BE3F0-003.cache.js ....
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 4:26 PM, John Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Bob, can you look at this patch? >> >> The problem is that if a program uses runAsync, a separate JavaScript >> file is created for each call to runAsync in each permutation. These >> files can really add up, thus resulting in a directory that is >> shockingly full of cache.js files. >> >> The attached patch modifies the iframe linker to instead put the files >> in a subdirectory named "deferredjs". Does it look good? >> > > I would suggest adding another level of directories under there, using the > first character of the hash. Otherwise, that directory will be nearly as > full as the top-level one was before the patch. > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
