What about: A40BE3F0/ 001.cache.js 002.cache.js 003.cache.js
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 6:03 PM, John Tamplin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Bruce Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Would it make sense to group fragment files under a subdir whose name is >> the strong name of the startup script? >> A40BE3F0/ >> A40BE3F0-001.cache.js >> A40BE3F0-002.cache.js >> A40BE3F0-003.cache.js >> .... >> > > These strings will appear in URLs and are somewhat long already -- is > duplicating better than a smaller directory name? > > > -- > John A. Tamplin > Software Engineer (GWT), Google > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
