Let's not add this extra type JsArrayBase into the hierarchy. Why can't we just push the various methods down? We can always factor upward in the future. If we need shared implementation, we can factor that out into a package-private JsArrayImpl class.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Freeland Abbott <gwt.team.fabb...@gmail.com > wrote: > Scott, we already talked about this, but here's the patch for public > review. > > The basic goal is to surface the native length, sort, push, and shift > operators for JsArrays... I know you mentioned that IE6's push may be slower > than indexed extension, and thus a candidate for deferred binding, but I > wanted to get a basic implementation in first. > > There should be only checkstyle changes from what we discussed (though that > obviously doesn't help the rest GWTC). I also added some checkstyle fixes > to JavaScriptObject, introduced by my c5082. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
