I'm going to punt this review to Bruce & Kelly, 'cause I have no idea why having JsArrayBase would be bad. :)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Freeland Abbott <gwt.team.fabb...@gmail.com > wrote: > Scott, we already talked about this, but here's the patch for public > review. > > The basic goal is to surface the native length, sort, push, and shift > operators for JsArrays... I know you mentioned that IE6's push may be slower > than indexed extension, and thus a candidate for deferred binding, but I > wanted to get a basic implementation in first. > > There should be only checkstyle changes from what we discussed (though that > obviously doesn't help the rest GWTC). I also added some checkstyle fixes > to JavaScriptObject, introduced by my c5082. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
