While we're on the topic, it doesn't seem that the BundleAttributeParser
catches these special attributes. Specifically,

  <gwt:Button res:addStyleNames="css.myCssClass" />

doesn't seem to work.

- Amir

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote:

> And you can set the debug id via ui.xml:
> <gwt:Label debugId='joe'>Hiya, pal.</gwt:Label>
>
> If you're not going to use CssResource, there is nothing you can do with an
> id selector that you can't do with a class selector. I really discourage the
> use of id selectors, they're brittle.
>
> rjrjr
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Joel Webber <j...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> The biggest problem here is that ids have to be unique within a document,
>> and UiBinder has no way of enforcing this.
>> If you want to use it for styling, you're probably better off with
>> CssResource (we're working on updating the samples to reflect what we
>> believe to be the best pattern for doing this).
>>
>> As for testing, I assume you mean using something like Selenium. This is
>> actually why we created the UIObject.ensureDebugId() stuff -- especially so
>> that you can turn it off in deployment. But if you're using GWTTestCase, you
>> can just bind the elements to fields and grab those directly.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> joel.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Richard Vowles <
>> richard.vow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> One of the things I have noticed with the UIBinder is that you can't
>>> set the id on the fields - which is pretty important for css styling
>>> and testing. I seem to have to set them in code.
>>>
>>> <g:TextBox ui:field="tbWhatever" id="some-name"/>
>>>
>>> causes it to fail to compile. I know id is an attribute of getElement
>>> () but since this is a very common thing to do, I'd have expected
>>> ui:id or some such (or just id being acceptable). Am I missing
>>> something?
>>>
>>> Ta
>>> Richard
>>>
>>> On Aug 26, 12:49 pm, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote:
>>> > No plans to do drag-n-drop or anything wysiwyg. We'll probably
>>> > continue to focus on the basics.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to