Personally, I'm holding out for "transient goto"... imagine being able to leap to another chunk of code, and then back again when it finishes!
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > I'm especially excited about "goto"! Think of how powerful and flexible > that will be! > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) <r...@google.com > > wrote: > >> > // "future reserved words" >> > "abstract", "int", "short", "boolean", "interface", "static", "byte", >> > "long", "char", "final", "native", "synchronized", "float", "package", >> > "throws", "goto", "private", "transient", "implements", "protected", >> > "volatile", "double", "public", >> >> What a future it will be... >> >> Dan >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> >> wrote: >> > I don't promise this is exhaustive, but it catches up to the mozilla and >> IE >> > references, plus uneval from issue 3965. (Which wasn't on the mozilla >> > pages, despite being reserved there, so I'm in fact almost sure this >> > isn't exhaustive...) >> > >> > -- >> > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> >> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
