But with "volatile transient goto", we'll finally be able to do quantum computing in JavaScript.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> wrote: > Personally, I'm holding out for "transient goto"... imagine being able to > leap to another chunk of code, and then back again when it finishes! > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > >> I'm especially excited about "goto"! Think of how powerful and flexible >> that will be! >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) < >> r...@google.com> wrote: >> >>> > // "future reserved words" >>> > "abstract", "int", "short", "boolean", "interface", "static", "byte", >>> > "long", "char", "final", "native", "synchronized", "float", "package", >>> > "throws", "goto", "private", "transient", "implements", "protected", >>> > "volatile", "double", "public", >>> >>> What a future it will be... >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> >>> wrote: >>> > I don't promise this is exhaustive, but it catches up to the mozilla >>> and IE >>> > references, plus uneval from issue 3965. (Which wasn't on the mozilla >>> > pages, despite being reserved there, so I'm in fact almost sure this >>> > isn't exhaustive...) >>> > >>> > -- >>> > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >>> >>> -- >>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >>> >> >> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
