I thought that was "protected goto"? Semi-seriously, I'm also somewhat amused by reserving "synchronized" but not, say, "wait" or "Thread"...
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > +1 Freeland. You may then also like the planned "private goto", which > goes somewhere but it doesn't tell you where it's gone. > > On Tuesday, November 17, 2009, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> wrote: > > Personally, I'm holding out for "transient goto"... imagine being able to > leap to another chunk of code, and then back again when it finishes! > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > > I'm especially excited about "goto"! Think of how powerful and flexible > that will be! > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rice (דניאל רייס) < > r...@google.com> wrote: > >> // "future reserved words" > >> "abstract", "int", "short", "boolean", "interface", "static", "byte", > >> "long", "char", "final", "native", "synchronized", "float", "package", > >> "throws", "goto", "private", "transient", "implements", "protected", > >> "volatile", "double", "public", > > > > What a future it will be... > > > > Dan > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Freeland Abbott <fabb...@google.com> > wrote: > >> I don't promise this is exhaustive, but it catches up to the mozilla and > IE > >> references, plus uneval from issue 3965. (Which wasn't on the mozilla > >> pages, despite being reserved there, so I'm in fact almost sure this > >> isn't exhaustive...) > >> > >> -- > >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > -- > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > > > > > -- > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
