Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish static views of waves. But without that…
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote: > That's a very good point. I'm confident we could get anyone invited who > wants to participate, but there's nothing we could do yet to make such waves > visible to non-members, and that would be really bad. > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Paul Robinson <ukcue...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'd hate to see even more discussions moving away from here (because I, >> and maybe quite a few others here, don't have access to Wave). >> >> Paul >> >> Ray Ryan wrote: >> > >> > We can use the public Wave instance with alternate addresses. >> > Inconvenient, but it's not that big a deal. >> > >> > <http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors> >> >> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> > > > > -- > I wish this were a Wave > -- I wish this were a Wave -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
