Can you provide a little more context for why it should work this way? On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote:
> When we made the CheckBox widget implement HasValue, we had it throw an > illegal argument exception when setValue() is called with null. > > I think we goofed. > > Can we get away with relaxing that? I'd like this to be the case: > > CheckBox cb = new CheckBox(); > cb.setValue(null); > assertNull(cb.getValue()); > > > rjrjr > > -- > http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
