Bob,
any suggestions for a work around for the moment?
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For the editor part, I can see in the generated code for my editor that
>
> public static void traverseEditor(com.*.client.ui.EditorContainer
> editor, String prefix, java.util.List<String> paths) {
> }
>
> is completely empty
>
> but in this case, EditorContainer contains OfficeEditor because it's a
> composite. OfficeEditor has one AddressEditor and a
> HasDataEditor<Phone>
>
> so getPath() is currently buggy unless there's a way I can fill in my
> own traverseEditor somehow
>
> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm still having difficulties even with this syntax, again the
>> collections seem to be the problem
>>
>> so having "offices" give me back all my offices.
>>
>> but putting "offices.address", or "offices.office.address" or
>> "office.address" still gives me null
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Ray Cromwell <cromwell...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> the syntax of with() is with("property.subProperty.subSubProperty",
>>> "property2.subProperty2.subPropertyProperty2"). Bob can answer the question
>>> as to how to make deeply composited editors do the right thing.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, it's not just me, anything one level deep doesn't get picked up.
>>>>
>>>> So my offices also have on address and it's not in the getPath() array
>>>> either. Even if it was, what's the syntax for sub path elements?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Getting there. So now getPaths() gets me the data for my offices and
>>>> > patients but not the phones inside the offices.
>>>> >
>>>> > Since offices is using my own composite editor, I'm going to assume
>>>> > that's where the problem is
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 8:22 PM, BobV <b...@google.com> wrote:
>>>> >> On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Patrick Julien <pjul...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>> Yeah, because even with using with(). The problem is the entire
>>>> >>> object graph isn't there
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So I have a practice that has offices and each office has phones.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> So if I ask for offices. It fills in the offices but the phones
>>>> >>> inside it are not. This could get laborious if I need to do this
>>>> >>> manually for each editing activity
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Use RequestFactoryEditorDriver.getPaths();
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> interface MyOfficeDriver extends
>>>> >> RequesFactoryEditorDriver<OfficeProxy, OfficeEditor> {}
>>>> >>
>>>> >> MyOfficeDriver driver = GWT.create(MyOfficeDriver.class);
>>>> >> driver.initialize(requestFactory, editor);
>>>> >>
>>>> >> requestFactory.officeService().fetchOffice(1234).with(driver.getPaths()).to(receiver).fire();
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Bob Vawter
>>>> >> Google Web Toolkit Team
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
>>
>
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
