On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, John A. Tamplin <j...@jaet.org> wrote: > It should be the case > that if you ever see server code referencing client classes it is an error, > and if we leave things like this around then we won't ever get away from it.
Another place where server code (shared code actually) references client code is I18N: at least c.g.g.i18n.shared.Bidi* classes reference c.g.g.i18n.client.LocaleInfo and HasDirection.Direction; there might be others. Have the Bidi* classes mistakenly been put in shared instead of client, or was the client → shared move incomplete, or should the Bidi* classes have been split in shared vs. client APIs? I currently have no idea how/where to split I18N into client/shared/server JARs. -- Thomas Broyer /tɔ.ma.bʁwa.je/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
