Hi Brian: This is well-documented and looks like solid work. >
Thanks for the kudos! > I think the main issue will be whether it can be made compatible with > modular compilation. So the best timing will be to land it after modular > compilation. > > It looks like it should be compatible because the compiler doesn't need to > see how a @Rebind method is implemented in order to call the generator for > a call site? So we can run the generator in each module that calls a > @Rebind-marked interface method. > I was very careful when merged John changes. In fact, these where the only merge conflicts I remember during the prototype development. UnifiyAst, JProgram and GwtAstBuilder where our mainly conflicted classes, but he only added constant renamings and support for a new kind of visitor in these files. I think it should not be an issue, since my changes are only AST transformations. I must to elaborate the "Implementation Details" section to clear doubts. Thanks for read and annotate the proposal! - Andrés Testi -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
