Stephen: Per Brian's comments, a javax.rebinding spec might have a hard time > having feature-parity with GWT, because I imagine the Java8 plugins, > like APT, only runs on .java files currently under compile, and doesn't > re-process all of the types in .class files via .jars on the classpath.
I think so. As I know, Java 8 plugins are applied at the AST transformation level. > Which, AFAIK, is what John is getting to work--that a .jar (or .gwtlib) > is basically compiled, but can have one more global rebinding pass that > modifies its contents before GWT writes everything to disk. > Nice! I would like to know more details about what John is doing. Well, you mentioned "jribble", so now I'm a fan of basically anything > you say. :-) I'm aware of your involvement on Scala-GWT, and regret that the project is stopped. Let me know if I can help you and the others to reanimate it! - Andrés Testi -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
