That's fine, but you also need to consider future maintenance of your application. If your application is going to have any substantial life time and going to have to be extended and maintained, you're going to have a pretty hard time with gwt ext or ext gwt. However, I know the mentality of "quick, get it out the door, I don't care that there aren't any test cases" is still very prevalent. If that's the type of work environment one is in, they have little choice.
-- Arthur Kalmenson On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Niklas Derouche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> I disagree, you don't need any exotic graphic needs to use GWT. If you >> want a good, functional and quick web application, you use GWT. If you >> want a hard to maintain, buggy and poorly (if at all) tested, slow as >> a snail but a nice shiny turd of a web application, you use Ext GWT. > > So let me see if I understod you correctly; you don't like Ext GWT? > Seriously, > not liking stuff is fine. It's more than fine as far as I am concerned. I > wish you > all the best in your future endeavours and sometime down the line when you > have > spent more than a year or two in the workplace post your degree you may find > that you start making choices based on pragmatic weighing of pros and cons > and where your design ideals may take the backseat to cost and > time-to-market > factors. Your mileage will vary. > n. > -- > ---------------------------------------- > I've had a wonderful time but > this wasn't it. > Groucho Marx > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
