I've just started designing something new for client-server communications:
https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:search:group%253Agoogle-web-toolkit-contributors%2540googlegroups.com,restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%252BdUS_imAjA I'd love to get feedback on the ideas I put down there. On Mar 21, 11:24 am, Jamie Gennis <jgen...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'll take this opportunity to insert a shameless plug for > gwt-remote-action<http://code.google.com/p/gwt-remote-action/> as an > alternative to gwt-dispatch. The idea behind gwt-remote-action is that it > enables use of the command pattern using the same RPC interface as > traditional GWT RPC. This means you don't have to build your app from the > ground up with the command pattern in mind, but rather you can just use > normal GWT RPC and then augment it later when you need caching, > transactions, undo, or any other command pattern goodness. > > You can also check out > gwt-remote-action-extension<http://code.google.com/p/gwt-remote-action-extension/> > for > a library than enables the use of Gilead with gwt-remote-action as well as a > demo app. > > Best, > Jamie > > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:35 AM, zggame <zgg...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I second that idea. I start to really understand the gwt-presenter by > > reading its code. It is actually not that complicated and teach me > > some really nice lessons. And you also see a few short-coming of it. > > It is open-source under BSD. So you can do whatever to fit it for > > your purpose. > > > On Feb 28, 5:58 pm, Geraldo Lopes <geraldo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Initiatives like gwt-dispatch andgwt-presenterare welcome. > > > Reading others code is a very good way to improve our skills. > > > Even if one don't adopt the library it can be very helpful. > > > > Keep small (but useful) libraries river flow :) > > > > Regards, > > > > Geraldo > > > > On 28 fev, 15:40, Ed <post2edb...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Be careful using many third party lib's which are more like hobby- > > > > projects and will not be updated when gwt will come out with a new > > > > version such that you can't make the switch to the new gwt version.... > > > > I try to do everything myself and learn from others... I already had a > > > > few times that I was using other frameworks and couldn't make the gwt > > > > update when I wanted, but had to wait till all frameworks made the > > > > switch... or didn't made the switch at all. :( > > > > > GWT is awesome, short learning curve for simple things, and makes it > > > > very easy to create nice things which people then want to share with > > > > others... So they drop it in a google code project and never look back > > > > to it anymore.... > > > > > Of course there are also very good lib's like smartgwt and gxt > > > > (before: mygwt)... The latter one cost a bit, but there for future > > > > proof and has a very nice MVC implementation with dispatcher > > > > integration that is well suited for more complex app's and is very > > > > lean and mean... > > > > > Goodluck, > > > > Ed > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > cr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
