Hello David, I am very excited about the GWT 2.1 release, and planning to use it for a new upcoming project. I have been following and studying the MVP for quite a while now and experimenting with milestone releases.
Just wanted to share some of my thoughts: I personally find the name "Activity" a bit confusing. I've heard it is more popular in Android community. to me, it is MVP, P referring to Presenter (not Activity!) looking at the comments in source code, and tutorials, one can see Presenter and Activity are used interchangeably. eg: "An activity in GWT 2.1 is analogous to a presenter in MVP terminology." from MVP tutorial. now for the first time in your comment i read: > 2) There is not necessarily a 1:1 correspondence between Activities > and presenters. Your Activity might instantiate multiple presenters > and corresponding views. I did not know that, as it was not explicitly stated anywhere. so some clarification on that would really help. btw where does the name "Activity" come from ? about nested views, I was hoping that the new MVP framework address this, as I was planning to use that extensively. your solutions are interesting, I will try to implement them. any basic tutorial on composite views would be great. thank you for GWT 2.1 ! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.