FYI, bobv updated the RF developer guide yesterday with a separate section on "transportable types", discussion of polymorphic type-mapping rules, and slight re-wording of the Overview section.
http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideRequestFactory.html /dmc On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Aidan O'Kelly <aida...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm using RequestFactory for a 'non-data-orientated' app and its works > very nicely. > > Chained method invocation: > > MyServiceRC serviceRequest = appRequestFactory.MyServiceRC(); > serviceRequest.giveMeAString().to(stringReceiver); > if (needPojo == true) > serviceRequest.giveMeAPojo().to(pojoReceiver); // Pojo would be a > ValueProxy for example. > > // Now fire both methods in one RPC request, and do whatever > processing we want once both completed. > serviceRequest.fire(processStringAndPojoReceiver); > > A pretty nice way to call server side methods. You are certainly not > restricted just to persisting and retrieving datastore objects with > RequestFactory. > > > > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Michel Jonker > <michel.jon...@e-office.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > This is a cross post from the AppEngine group, but since I got no > > response there, I want to try this group. > > > > I am trying to figure out the best practise to consume my App Engine > > services from both Android and GWT. > > Since the services are not that data oriented, I first considered GWT- > > RPC. > > But given the fact that the GPE 2.4 sample project voor Android comes > > with > > RequestFactory, I am leaning towards this approach. > > I was hoping someone could validate this 'best practise' : > > When you have both Android and GWT consumers of your App Engine > > service, > > apply the RequestFactory pattern. > > > > TIA > > > > Michel Jonker > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://turbomanage.wordpress.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
