We haven't tried it in compiled mode yet, but it definitely doesn't
work in dev mode for us.
What is your code that returns a value? Neither the
FieldUpdate.update() nor the ScheduledCommand.execute() expects a
value back so I'm a little perplexed as to your context? And what is
MyVariable?
Sorry if I've just lost the plot.
On Aug 22, 8:47 pm, Jeff Chimene <jchim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/22/2011 02:34 AM, jsg wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi Jeff,
>
> > Given both our experience and your confirmation, I'm going to file a
> > bug report in case this thread isn't being noticed.
>
> > Thanks for your effort.
>
> > On Aug 22, 12:46 am, jchimene <jchim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Julian,
>
> >> I was too glib in my earlier reply.
>
> >> I, too, am seeing this problem. I hadn't completetly tested this app
> >> in production mode, and it fails miserably when compiled.
>
> >> So, I will post updates to this thread when I get a solution that
> >> works not only in development mode, but also when compiled.
>
> The answer (at least in my case), was the following:
>
> try {
> switch (MyVariable) {
> case 1: return 1;
> case 2: return 2;
> .
> .
> .
>
> } catch (NullPointerException e) {
> return 1;
> }
>
> In compiled mode, the try/catch doesn't, so the Javascript was failing
> at the switch expression evaluation. So, the side-effect was that the
> display was never refresh()-ing
>
> Try compiling in PRETTY mode and checking for exceptions.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> On Aug 19, 8:17 am, jsg <jgerso...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> We have refreshed the view because instead of calling
> >>> ListDataProvider.refresh() which simply calls updateRowData() for all
> >>> the registered displays, we've done the following:
>
> >>> By calling batchTable.setRowData() we are simply more directly
> >>> targeting both the display and only the row that has changed. (Rather
> >>> than all visible rows by calling refresh().)
> >>> As far as I can tell from the system, the DataProviders have no
> >>> knowledge of the internal column data and so they can't know if any of
> >>> the values of the rows have been updated. Only that the row instances
> >>> themselves have changed. (I have tested it now, just to be safe,
> >>> replacing setRowData() with refresh() with the same results.)
>
> >>> Our use case is not so uncommon that we should be struggling so much
> >>> with this intended functionality.
>
> >>> Thanks for your prompt reply.
> >>> Julian
>
> >>> On Aug 19, 4:16 pm, Jeffrey Chimene <jchim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 8/19/2011 4:53 AM, jsg wrote:
>
> >>>>> Thanks for your insight.
>
> >>>>> However, after wrapping the setRowData() in a ScheduleDeferred like
> >>>>> so:
>
> >>>>> Scheduler.get().scheduleDeferred(new ScheduledCommand() {
> >>>>> @Override
> >>>>> public void execute() {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> batchTable.setRowData(index,
> >>>>> Collections.singletonList(object));
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> });
>
> >>>>> There is no perceived change in behaviour.
> >>>>> I've tried wrapping the whole FieldUpdater.update() contents inside
> >>>>> the execute() action, but to no avail.
>
> >>>> I'm not sitting in front of my GWT development machine,so I don't have
> >>>> this exactly right,but where are you calling the list.refresh() method?
> >>>> You've updated the backing list, but not refreshed the view (at least in
> >>>> the sample).
>
> >>>>> On Aug 18, 10:01 pm, Jeff Chimene<jchim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 08/18/2011 12:05 PM, jsg wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Hello.
> >>>>>>> I've created a test case of my CellTable issue as a self contained
> >>>>>>> panel that can easily be imported into any project:
> >>>>>>>http://pastebin.com/zDLPKUNh
> >>>>>>> Basically I have two Date class fields in my row model, a startDate
> >>>>>>> and an endDate. Each Date has two columns in the CellTable (called
> >>>>>>> batchTable), one to display the actual date (a DatePickerCell) and
> >>>>>>> the other being a text input cell for the time.
> >>>>>>> When the FieldUpdater of the startTime or endTime is fired we parse
> >>>>>>> the value, save the new time and call batchTable.setRowData() with
> >>>>>>> the updated object and row index.
> >>>>>>> The problem is that when FieldUpdater is fired, the cells do not
> >>>>>>> update. I specifically edited the FieldUpdater of the endTime cell
> >>>>>>> to be an hour later than what it was set at.
> >>>>>>> I've checked as best as I can that all the gets and sets of the
> >>>>>>> respective startDate and endDate are in order, but I'm thinking that
> >>>>>>> there's something about CellTable I'm not getting.
> >>>>>>> Apologies if I've missed anything.
> >>>>>>> I'm running: GWT 2.3
> >>>>>>> I've tested it in the latest Chrome and IE9.
> >>>>>>> Regards, Julian
> >>>>>> Try putting your update actions inside a ScheduleDeferred command.
>
> >>>>>> The issue seems to be the coupling between the FieldUpdater and the
> >>>>>> cellTable refresh logic. Running the FieldUpdate.update() action after
> >>>>>> the browser's refresh loop seems to address this issue.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
