Le 19/09/2012 01:25, Blake Kaplan a écrit :
> David Bruant <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I've had discussions with several employees who shared with me that they 
>> felt somewhat guilty to be there, because they hadn't been a volunteer 
>> contributor before being an employee. They felt that in a way, they 
>> didn't deserve to be there, or at least deserved less than other people 
>> to be there.
> I am curious about this. Do you mean that they felt that there were other,
> more qualified, people in the community that were looking for a job? Or, do
> you mean that they simply felt odd that they were being paid to work on
> Mozilla even though they hadn't ever contributed to it as a volunteer?
Only the latter. Maybe the word "guilty" was a bit strong when I
described the situation; "odd" is probably more accurate.

>> I would like to note that although on paper a meritocracy sounds like a 
>> goal to achieve, it may not be so. From what I have seen, meritocracies 
>> tend to attract like-minded people and consequently drive themselves 
>> against diversity.
> Why is this specific to meritocracies?
I didn't say it was ;-)
> It seems like this is a pretty natural
> problem for any community.
To some extent, hiring outside of the people who naturally came to
gaining "merit" is a way to bring people who are less like-minded.

David
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to