Hi Phil, Yes. NCDR CathPCI Registry is in fairly standard format. At KUMC, we are on the Version 4.4 since July 2009 and that is the data that we brought into i2b2. We have plans of loading the prior Versions' data in the near future. https://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/docs/public-data-collection-documents/cathpci_v4_codersdictionary_4-4.pdf?sfvrsn=2 https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/ncdr_concepts_load.sql https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/ncdr_constants.sql https://informatics.kumc.edu/work/browser/heron_load/ncdr_facts_load.sql
NCDR is a valuable source to get degree of Stenosis, Prior MI or Prior CABG information and is worth considering gaining access to. Dr.Waitman can correct me if I am wrong but I don't anticipate the base phenotype clinical criteria to drastically change. We might be seeing some improvements in the Procedure/Diagnosis codes specificity though. Thanks Sravani -----Original Message----- From: Phillip Reeder [mailto:phillip.ree...@utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 2:58 PM To: gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu Cc: Sravani Chandaka; Dan Connolly; nate.apa...@cerner.com; Russ Waitman; Nathan Graham; Brittany Zschoche Subject: Re: [gpc-informatics] #263: Adaptable cohort query design and administration Is the NCDR cath pci registry a fairly standard format, like the NAACCR file, and is this something all site should be working to gain access to? Or should we wait until the cohort query is more defined before we work on it. Phillip Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 17, 2015, at 2:46 PM, GPC Informatics <d...@madmode.com> wrote: > > #263: Adaptable cohort query design and administration > --------------------------+-------------------------------- > Reporter: schandaka | Owner: schandaka > Type: design-issue | Status: assigned > Priority: minor | Milestone: adaptable-accrual > Component: data-stds | Resolution: > Keywords: | Blocked By: 276 > Blocking: 353 | > --------------------------+-------------------------------- > > Comment (by schandaka): > > At KUMC, we have brought our NCDR CathPCI Registry data into i2b2. > Degree of Stenosis, Prior MI and Prior PCI are explicit in the > registry and did not require NLP. Ejection Fraction is brought into > i2b2 from Clarity order_results. > In my first attempt to put together i2b2 query for ADAPTABLE base > phenotype I created two queries and shared them on babel under > ADAPTABLE folder. > - ADAPTABLE_KUMC > - ADAPTABLE_KUMC_WITHOUT_EF_NCDR > > ||Query Name||Includes or Excludes EF, Stenosis,Prior MI,Prior > CABG||Patient Count in HERON(KUMC)|| > ||ADAPTABLE_KUMC||Includes||3020|| > ||ADAPTABLE_KUMC_WITHOUT_EF_NCDR||Excludes||3001|| > As the base phenotype document had AHRQ-CCS categories for > Procedures/Diagnoses listed, please note that procedures and diagnoses > (ICD9 and ICD10) included in the queries might not be quite accurate. > Having ICD9/ICD10/SNOMED in the base phenotype would have been > extremely helpful to have the diagnosis/procedure speficity. That is > one of the feedback points that I have sent to Lena in addition to > considering NCDR CathPCI registry as a possible source to get EF, > Stenosis, Prior MI and Prior CABG. > > -- > Ticket URL: > <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/trac/Project/ticket/263#comment:18> > gpc-informatics <http://informatics.gpcnetwork.org/> > Greater Plains Network - Informatics > _______________________________________________ > Gpc-dev mailing list > Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu > http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev ________________________________ UT Southwestern Medical Center The future of medicine, today. _______________________________________________ Gpc-dev mailing list Gpc-dev@listserv.kumc.edu http://listserv.kumc.edu/mailman/listinfo/gpc-dev
