In any case Cedric, that was not what I was proposing. I was proposing that a user well experienced with MD3 be pitted against a user of BP and over a period of say 10 minutes see who could output the most material eg print lots of scripts, link from within the program to resource material on the web, produce multiple specialist letters, handouts to patients, care plans, medication reviews, etc etc etc
It was more a fun thing than a serious challenge. I firmly believe MD3 would win hands down (or in my hands anyway :-)) -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cedric Meyerowitz Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2005 6:26 PM To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Picking another package other than MD2 -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dr John Van Dyck Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2005 5:23 PM To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk' Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Picking another package other than MD2 What an excellent point. That would allow each user to use whatever 'flavour' he preferred, like favourite os distro. -----Original Message----- John, Yet you don't answer my original question as to lack of cooperation from HCN in sending us copies of MD3. Will you send us copies ? Furthermore another important point about picking software. How can any non MD2 user out there realy decide about buying MD3 if they don't have access to MD forum. If any MD2 user says anything negative, they get banned from MD forum. This is the software you recommend ?? Cedric _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk _______________________________________________ Gpcg_talk mailing list [email protected] http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk
