My BP backup file is 275MB - but only recently started scanning - so about
1000 scanned docs.

Each work station needs to have printers setup - path and radiology forms,
links to billing package etc, - - took a few hours to setup ALL pc's in
building - about 15 pc's

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mario Ruiz
Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2005 7:33 PM
To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Picking another package other than MD2
Importance: High

> The data conversion was flawless - and so easy. Took 6 hours overnight.
> 23,000 patient files converted - with great accuracy. 

How much data (in Gb) Alan?.

> - yes, each workstation does need to be
> configured and it does take a good few hours to set each PC, printers and
> links up.

sorry my ignorance, why does each PC needs to be configured?

Mario.



Alan Leeb wrote:
> Can now speak from experience - re change over from MD2  to BP.
> 
> It was an absolute fizzer !!!!! - expected the worst - could not have gone
> smoother.  From docs, reception and nurses - NO WORRIES - they just USED
it
> like they had been for years.
> 
> The data conversion was flawless - and so easy. Took 6 hours overnight.
> 23,000 patient files converted - with great accuracy. 
> We trialed BP for a week or so prior to change over , running in
conjunction
> with MD - changed over database on a Saturday morning - 
> 
> Now this impressed me - On the Friday received a call from BP support  -
was
> given a mobile number to call for any assistance over the weekend - used
it
> twice for some simple settings - the support was unbelievable - accurate,
> timely and very reassuring.
> 
> Saturday morning went smoothly  - yes, each workstation does need to be
> configured and it does take a good few hours to set each PC, printers and
> links up. 
> 
> All docs on board Monday morning,  --- new software - full day - once
again
> expected a nightmare with potential for disaster - NO hassles at all  -
few
> minor niggles like finding the right buttons to do what you expected with
MD
> . - but once again docs took to it like they had been using it for years
- 
> 
> Have not looked back - no ads AT ALL, - speed ++, 
> Overall I like the way it works - maybe its more intuitive, but seem to be
> able to find things, and feel more confident of being able to build up a
> highly functional electronic record. 
> 
> We have few niggles which I am confident WILL be ironed out, but they
really
> are minor.
> 
> The BP forum is great. 
> 
> Well that's my personal experience.
> Alan
>   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Dr John Van Dyck
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2005 5:09 PM
> To: 'General Practice Computing Group Talk'
> Subject: RE: [GPCG_TALK] Picking another package other than MD2
> 
> Most of it Liz we could agree on surely, the letters, the reference
> material, the specialist letters with progress notes and results added,
the
> educational material  etc etc   if not the GPMPs and TCA's or medication
> reviews etc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Elizabeth Dodd
> Sent: Wednesday, 21 December 2005 8:01 PM
> To: General Practice Computing Group Talk
> Subject: Re: [GPCG_TALK] Picking another package other than MD2
> 
> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 19:31, Dr John Van Dyck wrote:
> 
>>I was proposing that a user well experienced with MD3 be pitted against a
>>user of BP and over a period of say 10 minutes see who could output the
>>most material   eg print lots of scripts, link from within the program to
>>resource material on the web, produce multiple specialist letters,
> 
> handouts
> 
>>to patients, care plans, medication reviews, etc etc etc
> 
> Is this material to be useful or just material?
_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

_______________________________________________
Gpcg_talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://ozdocit.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gpcg_talk

Reply via email to