Yo Hans!

On Sun, 7 Dec 2025 22:51:47 +0100
Hans Mayer <[email protected]> wrote:

> The product type for first one was "Ultra-rapid" and now it's "Final".
> Also interesting, the observation for the first one was only GPS C1C
> C2L L1C L2L and now is Galileo included E C1C L1C

Maybe the Galileo data is late to arrive.

> The 95% sigma was 12 and 10 mm , now its 13 and 11 mm
> And calculating the distance between these 2 results I get a distance
> of 40 mm with bearing 104 deg
> This two results are out of the 95% sigma range each other.

I have yet to see a published GNSS accuracy number of any kind that
stood up to real world testing.  Can we sue them?

RGDS
GARY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
        [email protected]  Tel:+1 541 382 8588

            Veritas liberabit vos. -- Quid est veritas?
    "If you can't measure it, you can't improve it." - Lord Kelvin

Attachment: pgpoekfi65XBY.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to