Hello all, as I understood from Glynn, it's too early to release 6.4.0 as GRASS 7 is still too far away. I also agree with Markus, that we need to release something for packagers, as more and more users are suggested to use SVN version and not some semi-stable version from packages. GRASS 6.3.0 was technical preview release - it was never promised to be stable. I see no point in releasing 6.3.1 with just some fixes. My proposal - let's make another "technical preview" from devbranch6 called i.e. 6.3.90 (just a devbranch6 tag within week or so) - we get something out for users who don't compile GRASS, still it's not final 6.4.0, that should be stable and bug free, as main release between 6.2 and 7.0 should be.
Just my 0.002, Maris. 2008/10/23 Markus Neteler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Glynn Clements > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'd be more concerned about 6.3.1, as there have been a fair number of >> straightforward bug-fixes since 6.3.0. > > Well, I know easily 50 fixes which I have NOT backported to 6.3.svn, knowing, > that 6.4.0.RCX is forthcoming soon. Many are related to portability, too. > So I do think that we need a 6.4.0 the next months (at least I won't go > through > all those fixes to check if they are present in 6.3.svn - even the code layout > isn't reindented). > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-dev mailing list > grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev > _______________________________________________ grass-dev mailing list grass-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-dev