My 2 cents. While that might seem like a good idea for now, given that there has been no change to the PSC for a number of years, I'm not convinced that is the best strategy for the long term. For a body like this, it is very important to have continuity of technical knowledge, but more importantly of project culture, ethos, and history. That is best achieved by staggered elections in which some portion (third, half) of the PCS is elected every couple years. It sounds like we need to replace about 1/3 of the PCS now due to some of the group moving on. So that would be a convenient number to get.
Michael ____________________ C. Michael Barton Director, Center for Social Dynamics & Complexity Professor of Anthropology, School of Human Evolution & Social Change Head, Graduate Faculty in Complex Adaptive Systems Science Arizona State University voice: 480-965-6262 (SHESC), 480-965-8130/727-9746 (CSDC) fax: 480-965-7671 (SHESC), 480-727-0709 (CSDC) www: http://www.public.asu.edu/~cmbarton, http://csdc.asu.edu > On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Helena Mitasova <hmit...@ncsu.edu> wrote: >>> On Jun 3, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Moritz Lennert <mlenn...@club.worldonline.be> >>> wrote: >>>> Can't we just have a system where every 3 years we reelect the complete >>>> PSC, >>>> but people can be candidates for their own succession ? I'm not sure that >>>> there is >>>> such a rush of people for this job, but if there is, great. Then the >>>> election will actually >>>> be a real election ;-) >> >> that is what I had in mind. > > I start to like the idea to dissolve and re-elect (this time only or > always) the entire PSC: > > Markus > _______________________________________________ > grass-psc mailing list > grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
