On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Markus Neteler <nete...@osgeo.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Michael Barton <michael.bar...@asu.edu> wrote: >> My 2 cents. While that might seem like a good idea for now, given that there >> has been no change to the PSC for a number of years, I'm not convinced that >> is the best strategy for the long term. For a body like this, it is very >> important to have continuity of technical knowledge, but more importantly of >> project culture, ethos, and history. That is best achieved by staggered >> elections in which some portion (third, half) of the PCS is elected every >> couple years. It sounds like we need to replace about 1/3 of the PCS now due >> to some of the group moving on. So that would be a convenient number to get. > > This is how the OSGeo board renewal works. > > Since we are currently rather stuck with a lot of inactive members I > suggest to proceed and renew asap.
[ ... 12 days later ...] The lack of feedback supports my idea to suggest to dissolve the current PSC :-) Best Markus _______________________________________________ grass-psc mailing list grass-psc@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-psc
