Hi Maxim, On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:51 PM, Maxim Dubinin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > we've started looking into translating individual docs for modules, > but found some inconsistency between html version from the website and > description.html from some of the modules.
Note that description.html in the source code is used to *construct* the final HTML version (this happens when the source code is compiled). > Take d.colorlist for example as html: > http://grass.osgeo.org/grass64/manuals/html64_user/d.colorlist.html > and compare with description.html for this command from either 6.3 or > 6.4. For some reason description.html from neither 6.3 or 6.4 contains > some parts such as NAME, SYNOPSIS etc. I assume these parts are added > automatically, is it so? Exactly. Each module, using --html-description flag, generates the HTML template which is then combined with the content of description.html. ... > Can someone explain what is going on with them and how > description.html should really look like? Based on what is in /doc for > sample module page, the description.html should start from > DESCRIPTION, is it so? description.html contains the real descriptive content without parameters, flags etc. For translations, description.html is relevant. Not the web page. Hope it is clear now. Markus _______________________________________________ grass-translations mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-translations
