Will it help if I provide list of modules, for which docs are not fixed in develbranch_6? Some of them are among those *few* that actually need header, I assume.
Also I've notice that for some modules description.html is substituted by module-name.html (see for example r.mapcalc.html, lrs.html), is it normal? Just wondering. Anyway, here is the list: http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/drivers/cairo/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/general/g.parser/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/general/g.setproj/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/drivers/PNG/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/drivers/PS/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/raster/r.li/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/raster/r.li/r.li.daemon/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/lib/db/sqlp/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/drivers/XDRIVER/description.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/vector/v.lrs/lrs.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/raster/r.mapcalc/r.mapcalc.html http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/raster/r.mapcalc/r3.mapcalc.html -- Best regards, Maxim Вы писали 18 декабря 2008 г., 11:36:09: MN> (cc to list) MN> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Maxim Dubinin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for explanations, this was more or less how I understand it >> too. >> >> Now for the second part of my question, do I understand right then, >> that this was simply incorrectly formed module doc? >> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_3/display/d.colors/description.html MN> ah, now I get it! MN> Yes, that was AFAIK wrong, I have it removed (please check again above link). >> thus fixed for 6.4 >> http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/d.colors/description.html MN> Right. MN> Note that a *few* modules really need the header part included in MN> description.html since the modules cannot generate the template. MN> Best regards, MN> Markus _______________________________________________ grass-translations mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-translations
