(cc to list) On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Maxim Dubinin <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for explanations, this was more or less how I understand it > too. > > Now for the second part of my question, do I understand right then, > that this was simply incorrectly formed module doc? > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_6_3/display/d.colors/description.html
ah, now I get it! Yes, that was AFAIK wrong, I have it removed (please check again above link). > thus fixed for 6.4 > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/develbranch_6/display/d.colors/description.html Right. Note that a *few* modules really need the header part included in description.html since the modules cannot generate the template. Best regards, Markus _______________________________________________ grass-translations mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-translations
