Also, make sure you mask any Nulls since that often seems to be the problem 
when i.cluster doesn't work as expected, especially if you are using landsat 7 
slc-off imagery - although I've also experienced it with Landsat 4 and 5 
imagery. 

[Sent from a mobile device]

On Feb 18, 2011, at 4:38 PM, Nick Jachowski <njachow...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ned and Daniel,
> 
> I have run into this problem in the past, and I believe it may have to do 
> with your convergence, min_size, and classes settings.  Try decreasing some 
> of those and see if you don't get better results.  You can also try 
> increasing your separation from 0.0 (the default) to 1.0 or 1.5.
> 
> Nick
> 
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 4:24 PM, daniel mcinerney 
> <daniel.o.mciner...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ned,
> 
> I have been using i.cluster in GRASS 7 on a 64-bit fedora server,
> without any trouble.  However, I managed to replicate your problem
> and create a single class output by setting the parameter
> 'sample=5,5' as you had done in your example. If I run i.cluster without
> that parameter, the signature file and classification output both 
> have the number of predefined classes. 
> 
> Can you see if this helps with your data?
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Ned Horning <horn...@amnh.org> wrote:
> Hi - I would like to do an unsupervised classification using i.cluster from 
> GRASS 7 on my Ubuntu 64-bit machine. When I run i.cluster then i.maxlik on a 
> Landsat image I only get one output class, the entire image. Only one class 
> appears in the signature file so the problem is with the i.cluster step. I 
> tried running i.cluster on different images and always get just one class.
> 
> Here is the command line I'm using:
> i.cluster group=TM_r15c33@PERMANENT subgroup=AllBands 
> signaturefile=IsoDataSigs2 classes=20 sample=5,5 convergence=99.9 
> min_size=10000
> 
> Is anyone able to get i.cluster to work properly? It would be helpful to know 
> if it's a user problem or a bug.
> 
> Thanks in advance to anyone who can help.
> 
> All the best,
> 
> Ned
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> grass-user mailing list
> grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
grass-user mailing list
grass-user@lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/grass-user

Reply via email to