but.....damodar was questioning the idea of being 'modern' and 'secular' for being anti-imperialism. and he was to problemize the words modern and secular.. (i believe).
that idea of anti-imperialism is as euro-centric as imperialsim. fancying of modern secular scientific grand universal marxist anti-imperialist movement is not 'really' anti-imperialist. On 5/6/08, Murali K Warier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Apparently not. That's why Ahmedinejad, the Hamas, Fidel Castro and Hugo > Chavez all become front runners in the 'anti-imperialistic' struggle. After > all, 'we were all Hezbollah' for a week or so, weren't we? > > Best regards, > Murali > > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 1:08 PM, damodar prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> dear salim, >> I really doubt whether anti-imperialism whether anti-imperialism is >> synonymous with secular and modern!!! >> >> damodar >> >> > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Liberty, if it means anything, is the right to tell people what they don't > want to hear. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Green Youth Movement" group. To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---