http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/toi-edit-page/secular-manifesto-for-change/

Secular manifesto for change: Here’s how secularism must be reinvented
to credibly challenge the Hindutva narrative

March 21, 2017, 2:00 AM IST Saba Naqvi in TOI Edit Page | India | TOI

A Yogi Adityanath could not have been elevated to CM of the country’s
largest state had there not been a complete hollowing out of secular
values. For those of us who still have secular stardust in our eyes,
let’s recognise that secularism as practised in India has been reduced
to electoral management, that first sees Muslims as a herd and then
tries to keep that herd together.

It’s a vaguely insulting formulation, particularly as practitioners of
the craft of secular politics have auctioned out the task of
delivering the imaginary herd to a bunch of middlemen, all too often
clerics or strongmen with criminal antecedents. It should be crystal
clear by now that they repel others and have brought Indian Muslims to
the point where candidates who presume to be the people’s
representatives are unelectable and the community’s vote has been
rendered ineffective.

The secular model currently offers no counter narrative to challenge
Hindutva that claims to unite people above caste and region in a
national symphony. All of this has been some time in the making. The
clout of clerics increased ever since Congress famously capitulated
before them when it overturned the Shah Bano judgment in 1986. This
reinforced the “separateness” of Muslims and contributed to the rise
of BJP in national politics.

The All-India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) was at the heart of
that churning. Founded in 1973, it is a collection of clerics with a
motley crew of professionals whose main purpose is to protect Sharia
law. Half its members are life members who represent an orthodox male
viewpoint, by default promoted by the state that swears by secularism,
that actually means separation of religion and government. Frankly,
the Ulema should have no complaint with Yogi Adityanath, the head of a
religious order, occupying political office!

The same clerics also have their hand in managing Waqf properties that
can be described as religious endowments made in the name of Allah for
the benefit of the poor. There are approximately 3,00,000 registered
Waqf properties in India on about four lakh acres of land (the second
largest land holding after Indian railways). It is a national resource
that should have been developed for the welfare of the community (the
Sikh community is a model to emulate here).

Instead, many Waqf boards are repositories of corruption, both petty
and large. Yet they get away with it because any demand for scrutiny
is described as an attack on Islam.
It’s all rather pathetic. There is actually precious little that the
Indian secular state has given the Muslim community except to ensure
that they live for eternity in the museum of stereotypes, most notably
that of the clerics who mostly talk rubbish when they showcase their
views on television. The imagery of these men as “sole spokespersons”
only works to counter mobilise. The community has slipped on all human
development indices yet an entire mobilisation has thrived on the
argument that they are appeased. It’s true, the clerics have indeed
been appeased in a manner of speaking.

The real wealth of the Muslim community lies in its artisans, weavers
and craftsmen who make both functional and beautiful things with their
hands. It lies in the intellectual reservoirs of poetry and
literature, in music and architecture. It is a real irony that over
200 years ago a poet such as Mirza Ghalib would mock the mullahs so
relentlessly while we in contemporary India were doomed to take their
views so seriously.

These elections have also exposed as a zero sum game the cynical
mathematical model that works with the presumed value of the Muslim
vote. Indeed, a politician such as Mayawati should recognise that her
projection of the mullah-meat trader-muscleman candidates fitted
communal stereotyping and hurt rather than helped a community she so
grandiosely set out to represent. She spoke so incessantly of Muslims
that a casual visitor to Uttar Pradesh during the elections could be
forgiven for getting the impression that the state was voting to elect
a minority CM!

Now that the shock of the verdict has registered some voices are
beginning to express bitterness against the mullah-politician nexus. A
process of introspection has begun and at the very least the community
must recognise that in the narrative emerging in India their only
utility lies as an image that is a caricature of the multiplicity of
Muslim identities in India. No one will shed tears unless the change
comes from within. Here are my humble suggestions for a manifesto for
change:

* Tell the mullahs to restrict their activities to the masjid. Ban
them (short of issuing a fatwa!) from appearing on TV. Be vocal about
stating that you have different role models. Begin the process of
examining the structures of law boards and Waqf boards, managed by
groups of men guarding their turfs. Get professionals to create a
genuine welfare structure for the community.
* Ask for participation in existing government schemes instead of
harping on separate identity constitutional guarantees. Build
campaigns over economic issues, jobs, small loans, education and not
issues such as triple talaq. Yes, you will be baited but don’t fall
into the many traps.
* Salvation lies in propagating the many cultural traditions that
unite, not those that separate. Take on the conservative views on
music, women’s right and freedoms. Highlight the pluralist traditions.
* If someone comes asking for votes on the basis of fear and tells you
that Muslims are supposed to be in the frontline of the battle to save
secularism, turn around and tell them in that case it may not really
be worth saving.

Saba Naqvi is a journalist and an author.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to