Yes, the font encoding is very different, as it was decided to move all the glyphs into the UCS Supplementary Private Use Area A, and do that as part of this major release.
Henry On Tuesday, 14 April 2015 at 10:55:03 pm +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:25:49PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > I've tried rm -rf ~/.texlive* and rerunning lualatex twice, but it made no > > difference. develop branch rpm behaves the same as release-3.0 one. > > Tried also the 3.0-rc1 already generated fonts from > https://github.com/gregorio-project/gregorio/releases/download/v3.0.0-rc1/gregorio-3.0.0-rc1-sources.tar.gz > but then no glyphs really showed up on the staff at all, is the 3.0-rc1 font > encoding so different from 3.0-rc2? I admit I haven't used that tarball > to build the gregorio binary nor install its *.tex files, perhaps will try > that tomorrow. FYI, Fedora 21 ships with TeXlive 2014, and as I said > earlier, end of last year snapshot worked just fine (and older ones too). > All the gregoriotex related files are packaged in rpm, so there are no other > versions of the *.tex/*.lua/*.sty/*.ttf gregorio files in the textmf > directories. > > Jakub > _______________________________________________ Gregorio-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gregorio-users
