Some time ago I came across a similar problem when using this function
for a class. At the time I made a note to myself saying that the
problem was in the definition of lobs, which I changed to:
  scalar lobs=lastobs(y)
I hope this helps

On 28 September 2015 at 15:56, Ignacio Diaz-Emparanza
<ignacio.diaz-emparanza(a)ehu.eus> wrote:
> I have not much time for testing today, but it seems that a correction I
> included to avoid initial conditions very different from the first
> observations of the series is not working well for your data. If you change
> in the HoltWinters package the line
>
> series yh1= (0.85*y<= $yhat && $yhat <=1.15*y) ? $yhat : y
>
> simply to:
>
> series yh1= $yhat
>
> you will have results more similar (but not exactly) to yours (I think we
> are using different initial conditions).
>
>
>
> El 28/09/15 a las 14:23, Raul Gimeno escribió:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I've been using the Holt-Winters package but I cannot replicate my
>> Excel-calculation results with this package.
>> The starting value from the package for the trend is 245 mine is 166.396.
>> By
>> running a regression on the full sample I get completely different results
>> for these starting values, although the same methodology as described in
>> the
>> help description has been used.
>> For replication purposes I send my excel spreadsheet and I would be glad
>> to
>> understand how these starting values have been effectively calculated.
>> Thank you for your help
>> Raul Gimeno
>>
>> **
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Gretl-users mailing list
>> Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
>> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>
>
>
> --
> Ignacio Díaz-Emparanza
> Departamento de Economía Aplicada III (Econometría y Estadística)
> Universidad del País Vasco - Euskalherriko Unibertsitatea, UPV/EHU
> Tfno: (+34) 94 601 3732
> http://www.ehu.eus/ea3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gretl-users mailing list
> Gretl-users(a)lists.wfu.edu
> http://lists.wfu.edu/mailman/listinfo/gretl-users
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to