All,
Thanks for the review and support. I will update the draft over the next
few days. I assume I will just upload it in the same manner as I have
previously.
Regards
Tony K
On 21/12/11 5:09 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, t.petch<ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
Chris
Are you able to declare a consensus on this? I believe that we are now past
"12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)"
we are past that date... by a bit :( calendar failure. everyone seems
to have supported it, no disenting issues and even some people
claiming fix actions, w00t!
so this seems as though it's a WG doc now. I'll ask the author(s) to
spin a new copy of the current draft (feel free to fix up some things
about the as112 notes in the call) as a WG doc something like:
draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
seems right?
-chris
(thanks for the nudge tom!)
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Morrow"<christopher.mor...@gmail.com>
To:<grow-cha...@tools.ietf.org>;<grow@ietf.org>;
<tkirk...@anthony-kirkham.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:30 AM
Folks,
As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to
read/review/think-about the subject draft:
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-07>
Anthony et-al have done some good work documenting some practices for
operators, if the work seems to be relevant for this group, let's hear
that and we'll adopt the document. If, on the other hand, we believe
this belongs elsewhere, let's provide a pointer set to the authors.
Call for this ends: 12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)
Thanks,
Chris
(co-chair)
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
--
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
