On 2014-05-14 10:43, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
If you stop claiming that bgpsec is there to prevent this and reframe
the
document as "bgpsec can't stop route leaks", I'm fine with that.
Indeed it's not about MITM to BGPSEC itself, it's about BGPSEC not
solving this problem.
Perhaps "the MITM attack enabled by the route leak that even a
fully-deployed BGPSEC is unable to prevent" is indeed the crux of the
issue ;-) .. and I understand your point. Let me circle back with see
if we can find a way to accommodate this distinction.
-danny
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
