Supporting wg adoption of this draft. Padma
________________________________________ From: GROW <[email protected]> on behalf of Christopher Morrow < [email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:23 PM To: [email protected] [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [GROW] [WGAC] Working group adoption call: draft-sriram-route-leak-problem-definition Howdy grow folks, During the meeting on Monday Sriram brought up the topic of asking for working-group adoption for this draft: draft-sriram-route-leak-problem-definition The abstract is: " A systemic vulnerability of the Border Gateway Protocol routing system, known as 'route leaks', has received significant attention in recent years. Frequent incidents that result in significant disruptions to Internet routing are labeled "route leaks", but to date we have lacked a common definition of the term. In this document, we provide a working definition of route leaks, keeping in mind the real occurrences that have received significant attention. Further, we attempt to enumerate (though not exhaustively) different types of route leaks based on observed events on the Internet. We aim to provide a taxonomy that covers several forms of route leaks that have been observed and are of concern to Internet user community as well as the network operator community." Could we have a 2.5wk (so we don't end mid-week losing half a week to the meeting) adoption thought/vote/discussion for this draft in GROW, please? At the mic when asked about this topic there were roughly 20 or so folk in favor of adoption, and none opposed to that direction. -chris _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
