I support adoption of this draft. Sorry for the noise if a decision has already been made (although I could find any notifications).
regards -Carlos On 11/13/14 12:23 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > Howdy grow folks, > During the meeting on Monday Sriram brought up the topic of asking for > working-group adoption for this draft: > > draft-sriram-route-leak-problem-definition > > The abstract is: > " A systemic vulnerability of the Border Gateway Protocol routing > system, known as 'route leaks', has received significant attention in > recent years. Frequent incidents that result in significant > disruptions to Internet routing are labeled "route leaks", but to > date we have lacked a common definition of the term. In this > document, we provide a working definition of route leaks, keeping in > mind the real occurrences that have received significant attention. > Further, we attempt to enumerate (though not exhaustively) different > types of route leaks based on observed events on the Internet. We > aim to provide a taxonomy that covers several forms of route leaks > that have been observed and are of concern to Internet user community > as well as the network operator community." > > Could we have a 2.5wk (so we don't end mid-week losing half a week to > the meeting) adoption thought/vote/discussion for this draft in GROW, > please? > > At the mic when asked about this topic there were roughly 20 or so > folk in favor of adoption, and none opposed to that direction. > > -chris > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
