Robert Raszuk wrote: > The problem with 16:16 and now with endorsing 32:32:32 is that it still > requires an external oracle to manually translate encoded magic number > into set of actions.
I'm struggling to understand how and why this is relevant to adopting large as-is. Operators are free to choose their own semantics and their own constructions. If you feel that it should be otherwise, post a bunch of drafts to IDR and GROW and let's discuss them. Nick _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
