Because if we say adopt large as 4:4:4:4 amount of this mapping is reduced.
Or we can adopt as-is then enlarge ... Thx, r. On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Raszuk wrote: > > The problem with 16:16 and now with endorsing 32:32:32 is that it still > > requires an external oracle to manually translate encoded magic number > > into set of actions. > > I'm struggling to understand how and why this is relevant to adopting > large as-is. > > Operators are free to choose their own semantics and their own > constructions. If you feel that it should be otherwise, post a bunch of > drafts to IDR and GROW and let's discuss them. > > Nick >
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
