Hi,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 03:06:29AM +0000, heasley wrote:
> Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 04:36:56PM +0100, Job Snijders:
> > pressure to set up bilateral sessions.
>
> Is that negative? Why not encourage ASes to have direct relationships
> and stop maintaining route servers? They should develop those relationships
> and it might even be suggested that security and trouble shooting could
> rely upon it.
Economies of scale. DECIX has over 600 active participants, and I have
little interest in talking to about 550 of them - but my routers would
appreciate having direct routes to the networks behind them.
So, route servers are a very (very!) welcome feature.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
