[ + John Scudder ] Just a quick note. The latest version (-12) of the document was just published; the diff is here: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11&url2=draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-12
I'm planning on releasing it by Friday unless I hear any strong objections... W On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 6:00 PM Tim Evens (tievens) <tievens= 40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > There is a conflict between the IANA registry > https://www.iana.org/assignments/bmp-parameters/bmp-parameters.xhtml#peer-flags > and > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10#section-4.2. > Originally, we defined that flag 0 would indicate the F flag but IANA put > this as flag 4 under the existing peer flags registry. > > > > Does anyone know if any implementation exists today expecting flag 0? If > so, is it a significant problem if we changed it to flag 4 to be consistent > with IANA draft assignment? We are still requesting a new registry "BMP > Peer Flags for Loc-RIB Instance Peer Type 3." This registry will start > off with flag 4 being assigned as the F flag. > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-11#section-8.2 > describes this request. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Tim > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list > GROW@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow > -- The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the complexities of his own making. -- E. W. Dijkstra
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
