Hello Jeff, yes, so far there still is intent. :-) I _might_ have forgotten to register it though (so far).
On that right now. ;-) With best regards, Tobias On Fri, 2026-07-03 at 14:45 -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > On 6/1/26 07:43, Job Snijders wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > Jumping in on a subthread - > > > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2026 at 08:35:04AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > > > The opsec-inform document, section 5.3, goes into some more > > > detail about > > > prefix lengths and where they are accepted. For this document, > > > dropping the > > > e.g. will remove the conflicting advice. > > > > > > This is a reminder for grow participants that the current work is > > > spread > > > across 3 different documents. I'd encourage you to see how the > > > advice for > > > each document harmonizes with the others. Doubly so since we > > > have one > > > document progressing through last call without the other two in > > > the logical > > > cluster. > > As we (GROW chairs) understand it, the ops-inform author wants to > > produce another revision (hackathon @ Vienna?) and then request > > WGLC. > > 126 is coming up soon. Is there still intent to try to do a > hackathon > editing session? > > -- Jeff > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] -- Univ.Prof. Dr.-Ing. Tobias Fiebig T +31 616 80 98 99 M [email protected] _______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
