Otavio Salvador wrote: > "Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Ok, now about the git. As Tomáš pointed out, the lack of portability is >> regression from CVS. If you think, for example, grub4dos is important, why >> can you choose git? > > Agree on that too. > > It's not that bad[1] and users can use git with cygwin or via git-cvspserver. > > 1. http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/WindowsInstall
Just leave cygwin out of the box... thank you! cygwin is one of the worst pieces of software that just does not work correctly. In my point-of-view portability means that you can use software natively on some platform and it does not include installing emulators or such to run software (like cygwin, wine). _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
