On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 06:02:20PM +0100, Marco Gerards wrote:
> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:42:39PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 18:17 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >> > - grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: addr=%p, size=%u\n",
> >> > addr, (unsigned int) size);
> >> > + grub_dprintf ("mem", "Using memory for heap: start=%p, end=%p\n",
> >> > addr, addr + size);
> >>
> >> Maybe addr+size-1 would be better? Inclusive boundaries are more
> >> intuitive. Just run "cat /proc/iomem" to see what I mean.
> >
> > Sounds better to me.
> >
> > Does this change (with addr + size -1) sound fine to everyone else?
>
> Why not showing both the range and the size. Isn't the size useful
> sometimes?
When? What you typicaly want to debug is whether your mem region overlaps
with something else, or so.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
