[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Perhaps gtk_builder_connect_signals_with_data (or something like that) > is the way to go. At least in a case we plan to include the DestroyNotify. > Otherwise we could tolerate one extra parameter into connect_signals, right?
I think so, one extra parameter is not a big deal. > Putting a DestroyNotify there will create the following (easy) bug scenario: Actually a GDestroyNotify is probably not a very good idea since the life cycle of the data structure is normally not tied to the process of connecting the signals. -- Johan Dahlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Async Open Source _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list